Taylor Swift Asks Judge to Dismiss ‘The Life of a Showgirl’ Trademark Lawsuit
Taylor Swift has asked a California federal court to dismiss a trademark infringement lawsuit brought by a Las Vegas performer over her use of ‘The Life of a Showgirl,’ calling the case “absurd.”
Taylor’s attorneys told the court that her use of the phrase does not infringe on Maren Flagg’s registration for ‘Confessions of a Showgirl.’
The lawsuit, filed earlier this year by Las Vegas showgirl Maren Flagg, centers on Swift’s use of ‘The Life of a Showgirl’ trademark in connection with her most recent album. Flagg alleges that the phrase is confusingly similar to her registration of ‘Confessions of a Showgirl,’ and argues that Swift’s use violates her intellectual property rights.
In Taylor’s motion to dismiss, filed yesterday, her attorneys sharply criticized the complaint, calling it “merely the plaintiff’s latest attempt to generate publicity by associating herself with Taylor Swift.”
Taylor’s legal team further argues that the complaint amounts to a “shotgun pleading,” meaning it is too vague and fails to clearly establish how the singer’s use of the phrase ‘The Life of a Showgirl’ infringes on Flagg’s trademark rights.
A motion to dismiss is a common early-stage legal maneuver in civil litigation, allowing defendants to ask a court to throw out claims before formally responding to the lawsuit with an Answer.
If a judge agrees that the complaint is deficient, the plaintiff is often given an opportunity to amend and refile the case.
Trademark disputes, however, are frequently difficult to resolve at this preliminary stage because they often hinge on factual questions, particularly whether consumers are likely to confuse the two marks.
How will a court rule on Swift’s motion?
Despite the aggressive tone of Swift’s filing, this case is unlikely to be dismissed by the court at this stage.
Courts are generally hesitant to throw out a trademark lawsuit before the discovery phase of litigation because the central issue, whether the trademarks are confusingly similar, is considered a factual question that usually requires additional evidence.
It is possible that the court could throw out portions of the lawsuit (or that the plaintiff could replead any portions that are found to be deficient by the court). But unless the court finds the allegations fundamentally defective, the more likely outcome is that the lawsuit survives and proceeds into discovery, where both sides can take depositions and request information from each other.
The bottom line: Taylor is not likely to shake off this lawsuit at this stage.
Josh Gerben, Esq.
Josh Gerben, Esq. is a nationally recognized trademark attorney and the founder of Gerben IP. Since launching the firm in 2008, he has overseen the registration of over 10,000 trademarks and handled over 1,500 trademark disputes. Josh's practice focuses on building and defending global trademark portfolios for clients. These clients include entrepreneurs, private equity-backed businesses, athletes, celebrities, and public companies. Frequently quoted by major media outlets like CNBC, CNN, The New York Times, and The Wall Street Journal, Josh is widely regarded as a leading authority in trademark law.
Do you need assistance with a trademark matter?
Contact an Attorney Today