Optimizing Trademark Work: What GCs Should Know About Firm Selection
There has been a growing conversation about how General Counsel (GCs) use outside counsel for legal work, especially for niche areas of law, like trademarks: do they go with a “Big Law” firm or a specialized firm?
As an attorney with a boutique trademark firm, here are my honest thoughts of the pros and cons:
Costs
Big Law: Large firms are significantly more expensive for trademark matters. They have little incentive to streamline tasks or reduce scope because their business model relies on billable hours. Routine filings, reporting emails, multi-class applications, and negotiations often translate into more time billed.
Boutique Trademark Firm: Specialized, boutique firms generally offer lower costs and greater efficiency. Streamlined filings and pragmatic negotiation can lead to strong outcomes without ballooning billable hours.
General Practice
Big Law: A big firm can deal with many different legal matters from employment law to mergers/acquisitions to IP. This means that GCs often will have one contact for all legal matters versus a different contact for different legal matters. I believe this is the biggest “benefit” of working with a large firm for GCs.
Boutique Trademark Firm: A more narrow practice area limits the types of matters a boutique firm can (and should) handle. But this means that a GC might have one contact at one law firm for employment issues, and another, at a different firm, for trademark issues.
Name Brand
Big Law: These firms are more likely to be recognized by folks outside of the legal space. This can have value to a GC, as others might recognize the name of the firm from other practice areas. If a GC wants to be able to tell the company’s CEO “we used WELL KNOWN LAW FIRM” to ease the CEO’s concerns about legal coverage, then a big firm is more likely to provide that.
Boutique Trademark Firm: Smaller firms, in general, will be less known to the general public, even if they are highly respected/known in their field.
Fire Drills
Big Law: Much more control over turnaround times. When a GC says, “I need this today,” a large firm can instruct multiple associates to cancel their plans and stay until midnight to complete it. This comes at a cost, as each of those associates will have a high billable rate and often less expertise on that specific subject matter.
Boutique Trademark Firm: A smaller team means less personnel. Urgent projects still get done, but the definition of an “urgent” project will vary from firm to firm and most likely only be used in rare circumstances.
Scaling
Big Law: A large firm can scale up quickly as needed for things like litigation, at a much higher cost for each of those team members.
Boutique Trademark Firm: Careful specialized hiring and lower overheads means not as many bodies to through at a problem in short notice. Smaller firms need to plan ahead and hire as needed for bigger projects.
Specialized Knowledge
Big Law: There are some excellent trademark attorneys at big firms, but because of costs and bandwidth, GCs will often work with less experienced attorneys. Big firms can assign numerous attorneys to a problem, but those attorneys often lack the specialized knowledge required for the task and attorneys must either learn that specialized area (at the client’s expense) or apply their existing knowledge, which can be less effective.
Boutique Trademark Firm: Highly specialized, highly skilled attorneys with knowledge of USPTO nuances.
Ultimately, the choice between a large general-practice firm and a specialized trademark boutique depends on what each General Counsel values most: broad coverage across many legal areas or deeper expertise and efficiency in a specific one.
Big firms can offer convenience and scale, while boutique firms often deliver lower costs and higher specialization for trademark work. For many companies, the ideal approach is a mix, using big firms for complex corporate matters and relying on boutiques for niche areas like trademarks.
Eric Perrott, Esq.
Eric Perrott, Esq. is a trademark and copyright attorney committed to providing high-quality legal services for any sized budget. Eric’s ability to counsel clients through any stage of trademark and copyright development and protection allows him to provide his clients with personalized advice and unique analysis. Eric can be reached directly at: [email protected]. The contents of this blog are for informational purposes only and may not be relied on as legal advice.
Do you need assistance with a trademark matter?
Contact an Attorney Today